Mer, 04/13/2022 - 13:00 / 14:30
205AB, Viale Romania
Speaker: Anca Gheaus , CEU Vienna
One of the questions that need to be settled by an adequate theory of justice concerns the extent of permissible parental partiality. As part of a general inquiry in this matter, the more specific issue of inheritance has recently drawn egalitarians' attention. They widely agree that the intergenerational transmission of wealth represents a great obstacle to distributive fairness, and that states should therefore seek to interrupt such transmission by strict regulation of inheritance. Assuming this view is correct, there remains the separate question of what, if anything, are individual parents permitted to bequeath to their children in the absence of just redistributive policies. I argue for the following thesis: Parents who live in unjust circumstances (of a kind I specify) have at least a moral option, but possibly also a duty, to bequeath more resources than they would be permitted to bequeath if they lived in a just society. The amount of permissible parental bequest is determined by reference to what children need to either (a) avoid poverty; or (b) have the level of resources they would have if they lived in just circumstances; or (c) avoid coming to non-comparative harms. Depending on empirical and normative circumstances, these alternative criteria can justify as permissible various levels of bequest. But in unjust circumstances it is likely that even the most modest levels of justified bequest would considerably contribute to the perpetuation of distributive unfairness. I conclude that parents’ permissible, or maybe even required, responses to unjust circumstances unavoidably perpetuate injustice.